Survivor challenges the Catholic church as the El Paso diocese seeks bankruptcy protection

Clergy abuse survivor Isaac Melendrez Jr. at age 14

EL PASO, TX — El Paso Catholic Diocese officials confirmed more than 30 years ago that a priest sexually abused Isaac Melendrez Jr. and other boys, but never shared findings with him, or offered him help. Now, he’s speaking out.

In 1981, 14-year-old Isaac Melendrez Jr. was sexually abused by a man he now refers to as “a monster” – his parish priest in Doña Ana, New Mexico.

The boy told his mother, who didn’t take any action and later sent him on out-of-town trips with the priest. He said he told a Catholic Church official in Las Cruces in 1982, then never heard back. In 1985, El Paso’s bishop sent the priest to a California facility that diagnosed and treated clergy for sexual misconduct and other mental health disorders. In 1994, officials in the El Paso diocese interviewed Melendrez and other abuse victims and found that the priest’s actions were “consistent with the behaviors of a pedophile” – but never shared that finding with Melendrez.

He battled depression, anxiety and thoughts of suicide throughout his life. Now 59 and living in Las Cruces, Melendrez is angry and frustrated that the El Paso diocese is seeking bankruptcy protection in the wake of lawsuits filed in New Mexico by him and 17 others who were abused by priests as children.

“They basically get to throw a blanket over a mass group of people and our voices are squashed. We were never afforded, once again, that opportunity to have them defend or to tell the public why they did what they did,” Melendrez said in an interview with El Paso Matters. “They can issue all the statements on how terribly they feel about it now, how this ‘alleged’ abuse occurred, how this is in the interest of the victims. It’s not in the interest of the victims.”

The El Paso Catholic Diocese sought reorganization under the federal Bankruptcy Code on March 6, saying it was the best way to ensure that victims of clerical sex abuse are compensated while allowing the diocese to continue operating. El Paso is the 38th Catholic diocese or archdiocese in the country to seek bankruptcy protection as a result of lawsuits brought by victims of decades of sexual abuse by priests.

Melendrez said he is speaking out to ensure that the voices of victims are heard as the bankruptcy process moves forward. He is the only one among 18 clerical sexual abuse victims who’ve filed suit in Las Cruces to do so under his actual name. The others are named as John Doe or Jane Doe in their lawsuits to protect their privacy.

“If something wrong is done to you, you have the right to speak up and stand up for yourself,” he said.

“And I also felt very strongly that I’m not a John Doe, I’m not a Jane Doe, I’m Isaac Melendrez. What happened to me, number one, was no fault of mine. Number two, I had no control over it. And in order for me to feel that I was doing justice to myself and other victims, I felt like I needed to put a person behind the story, not just a pseudonym.”

In a statement to El Paso Matters, the El Paso diocese acknowledged the bankruptcy reorganization filing “has reopened memories of terrible wounds that have inflicted great suffering to all abuse survivors.”

The diocese didn’t respond to El Paso Matters’ questions about Melendrez’s abuse.

“We have turned our tragic past into a continued commitment to keep policies that prevent these abuses against the God-given dignity of the person from ever happening again,” Bishop Mark Seitz said in the statement. “My prayer is that, as this reorganization process moves forward, the church will have an opportunity to make amends and that we will be a place where survivors can find healing.”

The amount of damages to be paid to the 18 plaintiffs who sued the El Paso diocese in New Mexico will be determined by the federal Bankruptcy Court in El Paso. El Paso Bishop Mark Seitz said the diocese expects most of the money will come from insurance policies, but it also expects to have to use some of its own assets to compensate the plaintiffs.

The bankruptcy process doesn’t include extensive testimony from people with legal claims against the diocese. The amount of payments to individuals will be decided by a process overseen by an independent trustee.

A horrific betrayal of trust

About to turn 15 in August 1981, Melendrez was small for his age, weighing about 70 pounds, he recalled. His family lived in Doña Ana, a rural enclave near Las Cruces. At his parents’ urging, he volunteered to do groundskeeping work at their parish, Our Lady of Purification Catholic Church.

A new priest, the Rev. Richard Nesom Jr., had arrived at the parish in January of that year. A Mississippi native, he was ordained as a priest by the El Paso diocese two years earlier, shortly before his 40th birthday.

In a March 1979 investigation that was required for candidates for ordination, priests at El Paso’s St. Patrick Cathedral, where Nesom had been assigned as a deacon, said he was not a good candidate for the priesthood. Melendrez’s attorneys obtained Nesom’s employment records from the diocese as part of the lawsuit discovery process, and shared some of the records with El Paso Matters.

The Rev. Stephen Gotwals, who was then the pastor at St. Patrick Cathedral, said Nesom “seems proud and arrogant,” and “has sought money in ways which smack of a ‘con’ job.” Gotwals said: “I don’t feel he has the humility requisite for any priest.”

He said he reached those conclusions in consultation with other priests at St. Patrick Cathedral.

Gotwals acknowledged the investigation was “pro forma” because the then-bishop of El Paso, Patrick Flores, had already issued what are known as dimissorial letters clearing the way for ordination for Nesom and other priest candidates.

He said “we feel strongly that the ordination of Richard Nesom at this time with his attitudes would be a source of grief in the future for the diocese, for the people and, most probably, for himself.”

The Rev. Joseph Alexander, rector of St. Mark’s Seminary in Kentucky, where Nesom prepared for the priesthood, pushed back on Gotwals’ findings and suggested in April 1979 that Nesom be initially assigned to a “small parish” to test his sincerity about being a priest. In 2002, Alexander was removed from the ministry after acknowledging that he had sexually abused a teenage boy at the seminary 40 years earlier.

Nesom was ordained by Flores in August 1979 and was assigned to a parish in Monahans, a West Texas town of 8,000, before being assigned to Our Lady of Purification in January 1981.

One day, which Melendrez estimates was in July 1981, Father Nesom invited him into the rectory – the priest’s home at the parish. This is how the lawsuit describes what happened next:

“Fr. Nesom initially made small talk and then suddenly swooped down and accosted Plaintiff. Fr. Nesom, who was considerably larger than Plaintiff, put his hand down Plaintiff’s pants, grabbed Plaintiff’s penis, and kissed Plaintiff. Plaintiff hit Fr. Nesom on the chin/throat area with his fist. Fr. Nesom recoiled. Plaintiff warned him that if he ever touched him again, Plaintiff would kill him.”

“I ran home, and I told my mom right away, and that’s the role you take as a child in your household,” Melendrez told El Paso Matters. “And I assumed that something would come of it, perhaps maybe there would be some type of conversation with the priest.”

His mother did nothing.

“And that had a profound effect on me,” he said.

Melendrez’s lawsuit says that Nesom provided money and a car to his parents.

The parents are both deceased. Melendrez said he wasn’t close to his father, and never was able to talk to his mother about what happened to him after he initially told her.

“My mother unfortunately had this ability to just sweep things under the rug, per se, so it was not a topic that we had much conversation, if any conversation, moving forward in my life,” he said.

After the sexual abuse, Melendrez’s parents sent him on a trip to Mississippi and Louisiana with Nesom, according to the lawsuit. In Mississippi, Melendrez said he barred his door with a chair to protect himself from the priest.

The priest continued to pursue Melendrez with innuendos and advances, he said. Nesom bought him tennis shoes and would sometimes show up at Court Junior High School in Las Cruces and offer the boy a ride home, which he refused.

When Nesom was transferred to Marfa, Texas, later in 1981, Melendrez’s parents had him and his brother help the priest move.

“This man made my life a living hell for the eight or nine months he was assigned to our parish. … I was mocked at school. He told other altar boys I was gay. He used the derogatory term for it that we don’t use nowadays, called me fag,” Melendrez said.

After a few years in Marfa, Nesom moved to El Paso around 1986, and was assigned to St. Joseph Parish and St. Patrick Cathedral. He took out advertisements in El Paso and Albuquerque newspapers in the 1980s promoting tours of Europe and the Holy Land under his “spiritual direction.”

He appears to have left El Paso in the spring of 1989, according to newspaper archives reviewed by El Paso Matters, and returned to his native southern Mississippi by 1991. Newspaper archives from that region show him performing funeral rites until the spring of 1994; a 1998 article in the Hattiesburg American described him as “a priest on disability.”

Nesom died in 2002 at age 63.

Informing the church

Melendrez said he first told a church official about the abuse in the summer of 1982, about a year after it started.

He was spending a couple of weeks with his aunt, who lived near the offices of the new Las Cruces diocese, which was created earlier that year by Pope John Paul II. Las Cruces and other parts of southern New Mexico had been in the El Paso diocese before that.

“I garnered the strength one day, and said I was going to walk in there and I was going to tell somebody what had happened to me,” Melendrez said. He had not yet turned 16.

“I remember that a lady came out and grabbed a yellow note pad and jotted down some of what I said. And I asked her what she can do, should we take it to higher ups and then kind of see where it went. I assumed that maybe something would be done, that I might be contacted, something of it, and nothing ever came of it.”

Melendrez said he felt betrayed.

“I felt like everything that had ever been given to me had been turned on me, and I was by myself having to defend myself against this predator,” he said.

Melendrez now owns a construction company in Las Cruces. He and his wife, Olivia, were married in 1986, and have two daughters and a son. He has battled mental health issues that he attributes to Nesom’s sexual abuse.

“It’s been a very, very stressful life. It’s been very filled with a lot of anxiety, a lot of depression. I’ve been suicidal at times. I was an alcoholic at one time,” he said. “There was no recourse for what I was going through – the era, the ethnicity of what I am. A Hispanic man is supposed to be machismo and stuff just kind of stays in you.”

‘Consistent with the actions of a pedophile’

In 1994, the El Paso Catholic Diocese reached out to Melendrez.

“I was contacted by the diocese because another victim had come forward and shared their story and mentioned that they believed that I was also a victim,” he said.

After the diocese contacted him, Melendrez told his wife for the first time that he was a survivor of sexual abuse. He was interviewed by two diocese social workers on Oct. 13, 1994, according to records obtained by his attorneys and provided to El Paso Matters.

El Paso Matters isn’t identifying the social workers, who continue to practice in El Paso, because they can’t respond to questions about confidential interviews.

“They were very businesslike. They had a lady and gentleman in there. They listened to my story, but they kept wanting me to sign some papers, and they kept wanting me to accept their offer of counseling and they promised that they could make this go away if I would just sign these papers and then follow their path of guidance and counseling,” Melendrez recalled in his interview with El Paso Matters.

“They were both very adamant about it, and I refused. And I said, ‘No, I’m not signing anything. You’re not going to magically make this just go away.’”

The 1994 investigation focused on another man who said he was raped by Nesom when he was a boy and Nesom was the priest at Our Lady of Purification Church. As with Melendrez, Nesom’s first attack on the boy occurred in the parish rectory, according to the Letter of Determination from the diocese investigation that outlined its findings.

The man told the social workers that Nesom sexually abused him at least one other time at a hotel in Las Cruces.

The social workers interviewed Melendrez and another man who said he’d been sexually abused as a child by Nesom at Our Lady of Purification.

They also interviewed Nesom, then a priest in Mississippi, at the diocese Pastoral Center.

Nesom denied everything. The social workers said in their report that the priest told them that then-Bishop Raymundo Peña had told him “that anonymous calls had been received accusing (Nesom) of other incidents of sexual misconduct.”

The report doesn’t include any mention of Peña being questioned as part of the investigation. He was El Paso’s bishop from 1980 to 1995, when he became bishop of Brownsville. He retired in 2009 and died in 2021.

The social workers believed the victims. Nesom’s actions – including providing gifts to teenage boys and taking them on out-of-town trips – “raise questions as to Fr. Nesom’s motives,” their report said.

The rape victim’s “description of Fr. Nesom’s actions was very credible and consistent with the actions of a pedophile, as currently described in the literature,” the social workers wrote.

The report recommended that the diocese pay $19,000 for mental health care for the rape victim, who had filed a claim with the diocese. The payment could increase to $35,000 if the man needed in-patient treatment.

The report makes no mention of helping Melendrez and the other sexual abuse victim interviewed as part of the investigation.

Melendrez said the diocese never informed him about the findings of the 1994 investigation. He learned about it only after he filed his lawsuit in 2024, and his attorneys obtained records as part of the discovery process.

He said the October 1994 interview lasted between 90 minutes and two hours. Melendrez said he never felt the social workers were concerned about him.

“I think their interest was more in trying to stop anything, stop anything further” damaging to the church, he said.

‘Never be allowed access to children’

The report was clear on recommendations for Nesom’s future.

“We recommend that in the event that Fr. Nesom remains a priest, he never be allowed access to children, adolescents or young adult males.”

Nesom was stripped of his faculties in the El Paso diocese, or ability to exercise his duties of ministries, after the investigation, Nesom said in a 1996 letter to the Rev. John Peters, then the pastor of St. Luke Catholic Church in West El Paso. The letter was obtained by Melendrez’s attorneys, who provided it to El Paso Matters.

It’s not clear what impact the El Paso determination had in Mississippi’s Biloxi diocese, where Nesom went after leaving El Paso. But there are no mentions of him performing church functions in southern Mississippi newspaper archives after April 1994, at a time when priests were routinely listed in newspaper announcements as participants at weddings and funerals.

In a January 1999 letter to the Rev. Rick Matty, then the chancellor for the El Paso diocese, Nesom sought help in getting permission from then-El Paso Bishop Armando Ochoa to perform a baptism for his nephew’s child in Mississippi. He said Ochoa hadn’t responded to him.

“With the permission of the Bishop in this Diocese (in Mississippi), would this one event be permitted?” he asked.

Melendrez’s attorneys did not receive a record of Matty responding in discovery material provided by the El Paso diocese.

Other documents show that Nesom was barred from performing Masses or sacraments in public, but asked several times for permission to do so.

In one 1999 letter, responding to a note in which Nesom said he was performing a monthly Spanish Mass in Mississippi, Matty reminded him that he could only celebrate Mass privately, and not with other people.

Both the 1994 diocese investigation report and Nesom’s letter to Matty say that Bishop Peña sent Nesom in 1985 to the House of Affirmation, a Catholic facility in California that treated priests for mental health issues, including sexual disorders.

Nesom told Matty he was sent for “testing and evaluation as to pedophia,” misspelling pedophilia. He told diocese social workers and Matty that nothing negative was found, but no records of his evaluation have been provided by the El Paso diocese.

Other documents obtained by Melendrez’s attorneys and shared with El Paso Matters show that Peña sent Nesom to the California facility after another boy said the priest had sexually abused him in 1984 in Marfa.

Peña determined that the Marfa boy’s complaints weren’t credible, in part because the diocese wasn’t aware of any similar complaints against Nesom. However, Melendrez said he told the Las Cruces diocese in 1982 that he had been sexually abused by Nesom.

The House of Affirmation, a network of Catholic treatment facilities, was founded by the Rev. Thomas A. Kane, a priest in Worcester, Massachusetts. The facilities closed in 1990 after Kane was accused of financial improprieties.

The Worcester diocese later settled a lawsuit that accused Kane of sexually abusing a boy from 1968 to 1979, starting when the boy was 9. The lawsuit said Kane offered the boy for sex to other priests.

In the letter to Matty, Nesom – then 59 – said his health was poor.

“I have some difficulties; more attributable to diabetes than to HIV. I am still AIDS free. I don’t get around well and do not leave my little apartment,” Nesom wrote.

In a 1997 memo to the Catholic Diocese of Jackson, Mississippi, Father Michael Flannery said Nesom “is in denial that he has AIDS.” He also said Nesom had been involved in an incident in Florida where he walked out of a restaurant without paying his bill, then drove over the manager who followed him into the parking lot.

Documents provided to Melendrez’s attorneys show that the El Paso diocese continued $850 monthly payments to Nesom for the remainder of his life.

Nesom died Nov. 25, 2002. His tombstone in Sharon, Mississippi, reads: “Rev. Richard Nesom Jr. Catholic Priest.”

‘There’s no more calling it alleged’

Melendrez would like to see the Catholic institutions that failed him held accountable. It’s hard for him to define what that looks like.

“It’s changed 100 times now, because our justice system is not a perfectly written essay. Our justice system is very flawed,” he said.

It may be easier for him to define what accountability is not – what he sees as half-hearted admissions, or evasions of responsibility.

Melendrez’s path to the courthouse began in 2019, with a statement from the interim bishop of the Las Cruces diocese.

Like other U.S. dioceses, Las Cruces had published a list of priests found to be “credibly accused” of sexual abuse. Las Cruces updated its list a few months later to add 13 priests who served in southern New Mexico parishes and had been listed by other dioceses as credibly accused of abuse.

One of the added names was Nesom, who was identified as credibly accused of sexual abuse by the El Paso diocese.

“These priests did not abuse here while they were serving in the Diocese of Las Cruces,” interim Bishop Gerald Kicanas said in announcing the 13 additions. “However, they have been listed on the credible lists of other dioceses.”

That didn’t look like accepting accountability to Melendrez.

Technically, Nesom sexually abused Melendrez and other Our Lady of Purification boys when the parish was in its last months in the El Paso diocese. But Kicanas’ diocese office was a 15-minute drive from Nesom’s former parish. And Melendrez said he had alerted the Las Cruces diocese to the abuse in 1982, without result.

Melendrez said he reached out after Kicanas’ statement to Margarita Martinez, the victims’ assistance coordinator at the Las Cruces diocese. He said he wanted a retraction of the statement, which sounded to him like the diocese was saying Nesom “wasn’t our problem, that was somebody else’s problem.”

He met with Kicanas, the former bishop of the Tucson diocese, a few weeks later.

“There was never any interest in our conversation with him doing any of that. He wanted to just talk about healing, and that he was sorry to me, and wanted to pray with me. And I lost my cool, and I just said, ‘You know, this is ridiculous. You people are not going to ever help us victims,’” Melendrez said.

The Las Cruces diocese didn’t respond to questions from El Paso Matters regarding its interactions with Melendrez.

The Las Cruces diocese is among the defendants in Melendrez’s lawsuit. The New Mexico lawsuits have been put on hold as a result of the El Paso diocese bankruptcy reorganization.

When the El Paso diocese announced its bankruptcy reorganization plans March 6, its news release referred to “allegations” of sexual abuse in the lawsuits brought by Melendrez and 17 others. In a video message issued to explain the bankruptcy filing, El Paso Bishop Seitz referred to “18 claimants alleging that they were sexually abused as minors” and “allegations that some clergy” harmed children in their care.

To Melendrez, that sounded like the diocese was trying to cast doubt on his story, even though it had found that testimony from him and other victims of Nesom was credible.

“The word alleged needs to be taken away. There’s no more calling it alleged,” he said. “If they want to argue that this was alleged, then they should have let us go to court and in the court of law, I could have told my story, my alleged story. Then a jury could determine whether my story was alleged or that my story was fact.”

In a news conference about the bankruptcy filing March 6, Seitz said the lawsuits by 18 people describing sexual abuse by Catholic clergy “appear to be credible. We’re not questioning that reality.”

As part of the lawsuit process, Melendrez wrote a letter of demand to the defendants – the dioceses of El Paso and Las Cruces, and Our Lady of Purification. He asked his son, Isaac Anthony Melendrez, to review it before it was submitted.

They cried together for several minutes. “And he said to me, ‘I had no idea how this affected you, because you never told us. And we grew up thinking that your problems with your emotions and being so broken, depression, anxiety and suicide, were because you weren’t happy with us as children.’ And that hurt me,” the elder Melendrez recalled.

Melendrez said he didn’t want to burden his children with his pain as they were growing up.

“So they have suffered right by my side immensely in this. And they are a great support system in seeing me through this. And they worry about me, and they stand behind me. But they know the profound impact that this has had on me, and how much it’s changed the course of my life, and how painful it’s been, and it’ll be for the rest of my life.”

Read original article

Oakland diocese, abuse victims far apart in settlement talks

Diocese of Oakland still working on settlement terms with abuse survivors

OAKLAND, CA — The dueling settlement offers from the Roman Catholic Diocese of Oakland and the hundreds of East Bay parishioners who say they were raped and abused by its priests are still separated by at least $90 million — and possibly tens of millions more, court records show.

Disputes over amount, insurance liability amount could add $90 million or more to final payouts

The chasm shows the work that remains to resolve nearly 350 lawsuits from people who say they were molested as children by church leaders and ordered by their alleged abusers to keep quiet. It comes just weeks ahead of a trial that is among a handful being moved forward as tests, which could provide new clarity on the diocese’s potential liability.

A committee representing those abuse victims recently filed court papers demanding $314.1 million over the course of three and a half years from the diocese and a related corporation overseeing its schools.

That compares with an offer of $180 million from the diocese and that corporation, made in late February, court records show. The offer reflects a small concession from the church to the victims, who have asked for more money to be paid up front by the diocese, which had originally offered a five-year timeline.

The diocese’s proposed payout also includes an additional $44.3 million from its insurers, upping the diocese’s total offer to $224.3 million. However, the committee representing abuse victims has previously taken issue with any insurance money being a part of any settlement offer from the diocese, as any such payout negotiated separately with the insurance companies could be significantly more than what the diocese’s accord alone could offer.

Dan McNevin, a state treasurer with the Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests, called the church’s offer “way too low,” and suggested the diocese sell off more real estate to help fund a larger payout.

“The bishop of Oakland has been low-balling this the whole time,” McNevin said. “He’s got to be less greedy — sell the land and fund this thing. It’s not that hard.”

The diocese did not respond to a request for comment Thursday.

Money isn’t the only sticking point holding up a potential settlement with the Oakland diocese.

One key disagreement rests in creation of a compliance monitor position, which would work to ensure that the diocese is following policies aimed at keeping children safe, such as improved training, background checks, the creation of a compliance advisory board of volunteers to help oversee the reforms. The committee of abuse victims wants that compliance monitor in place for no less than 10 years, while the diocese wants any such term to be generally capped at five years.

The dueling proposals come about a month ahead of a so-called bellwether trial — essentially, a legal test case offering new insight into how victims’ claims could fare in court.

The case was among the 350 or so lawsuits that were effectively paused in May 2023, when the diocese filed for bankruptcy. Seeing the lagging progress of settlement talks between the diocese and the abuse victims, a federal bankruptcy judge allowed six of those cases to finally proceed to trial. The goal: Allow each side to gauge juries’ reactions, as a means to hasten settlement talks for the remaining cases.

The first such case is expected to open on April 13, when an Alameda County jury will hear claims about how Stephen Kiesle, a former priest, groomed and repeatedly sexually assaulted one parishioner while that person was 10 and 11 years old. The assaults were alleged to have happened in 1975 and 1976, according to the lawsuit, which was filed in late December 2019.

The case was expected to go to trial March 16, but a judge pushed it off to mid-April, allowing more time for each side to reach a last-minute accord.

Kiesle has faced numerous other abuse allegations.

The former priest pleaded no contest in 1978 to a misdemeanor charge of lewd conduct for tying up and sexually abusing two boys at Our Lady of the Rosary in Union City. Yet despite his conviction — and the three-year sentence of probation that followed — he remained a part of the church during the 1970s and 80s.

He asked to be removed as a priest in the early 1980s, and Oakland diocese leaders also sought to defrock him. However, then-Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger — who later became Pope Benedict XVI — delayed a decision on his removal in 1985, citing “the good of the Universal Church.”

Kiesle was finally defrocked in 1987. Even so, he continued to work with the church, according to earlier reports from this news organization.

In 2004, Kiesle was sentenced to six years in prison amid a new wave of molestation charges, this time related to the abuse of a child at his Truckee vacation home in 1995. After his release for a subsequent parole violation in 2010, Kiesle was forced to register as a sex offender and moved into the gated Contra Costa census-designated place of Rossmoor.

Kiesle is currently serving a six-year, eight-month prison sentence for vehicular manslaughter. Authorities say he jumped a curb while driving drunk in April 2022, killing a 64-year-old man who had been walking home with his wife from a trivia event.

McNevin voiced confidence this week that a verdict in Kiesle’s case could improve the abuse victims’ negotiation position. A sizeable verdict, he said, could prompt other victims to demand more money from the diocese, and ask “Why should I get less?”

“If they don’t bring an offer up, then I think they have to let this thing go to trial,” McNevin said. “At that point, all bets are off.”

Read original article

The Diocese Subpoenaed a Survivor. What That Says About Institutional Reform.

Joelle Stories of Strength
Joelle Casteix: Author, Speaker, Advocate … and accidental activist

You cannot hate Mater Dei High School or the Diocese of Orange enough.

There is a particular kind of audacity that only large institutions seem capable of:

It’s the audacity of an institution that failed to protect children deciding that the real problem is the survivor who spoke about it.

There is something deeply revealing about an institution that once failed to protect children deciding, years later, that the survivor who exposed it deserves the scrutiny.

Recently, the Roman Catholic Diocese of Orange subpoenaed and deposed me in litigation connected to abuse at Mater Dei High School.

I was not a defendant. I was not accused of wrongdoing. I was not even a party to the case. I am simply a survivor who refuses to stay quiet. Apparently, that was enough.

The Mater Dei Context They’d Rather Forget

When I was a teenager at Mater Dei High School in Santa Ana, my choir director, Thomas Hodgman, sexually abused me and at least one other student.

Documents later released from the school showed that administrators knew about the relationship and failed to report it to law enforcement. Hodgman admitted in writing to sexual relationships with students. The school allowed him to quietly resign.

Years later, when those documents surfaced publicly, the picture became unmistakably clear. Adults knew. They minimized it. They blamed the student.

This was not a misunderstanding. It was an institutional failure.

The settlement that eventually followed did not change that reality. It only confirmed it.

A Familiar Playbook

If you have spent years exposing abuse and cover-ups inside powerful institutions, you begin to recognize some pretty nasty patterns.

Subpoenas. Depositions. Aggressive discovery requests.

Sometimes these tools are necessary parts of litigation. But sometimes they serve another purpose entirely. Sometimes they send a message:

Rattle the cage. Make the process painful. Remind the survivor who holds the power.

It is an old playbook. And it is a revealing one.

The Discovery Dragnet

What happened next was extraordinary.

The Diocese subpoenaed thousands of my emails and social-media messages, reaching back years into my life (Hello! We are talking almost 20 years here). Their attorneys discussed subpoenaing my personal phone records and even my bank statements going back to 2012.

Consider that for a moment.

A survivor of abuse by a Mater Dei teacher—someone who had already spent years exposing abuse and cover-ups—suddenly found her personal communications and finances placed under scrutiny. And I was not even a party to the case.

The subpoenas did not stop there.

Dozens of my former Mater Dei classmates were subpoenaed as well—people whose only connection to the case was that they attended the same school during the same time period.

In the process, information about the survivor at the center of the case was “leaked” by the private investigator hired by the diocese, violating the very privacy survivors are so often promised will be protected.

This is what institutional litigation can look like when it collides with survivor advocacy: a dragnet that pulls in years of personal communications and the private lives of people who simply happened to be nearby.

None of it changed the underlying facts.

A coach abused students. Adults knew. And the institution failed to stop it.

Reform Is Measured by Behavior

For more than two decades, Catholic dioceses across the United States have publicly promised that the Church has learned from the abuse crisis.

They have issued statements about transparency. They have announced zero-tolerance policies. They have assured the public that protecting survivors and children is now the highest priority.

Those statements are easy to issue.

But the real test of reform is not what institutions say. It is how they behave when survivors continue to speak.

When a survivor of abuse becomes the target of sweeping subpoenas, when former classmates are dragged into litigation, and when years of private communications are combed through in search of something—anything—that might weaken a survivor’s credibility, it raises a simple question:

What exactly has changed?

*Ahem* NOTHING

Because genuine reform does not require survivors to prove, again and again, that what happened to them was real.

Why This Matters Beyond One Case

The legal case that prompted these subpoenas has now settled.

But the broader questions remain.

When institutions facing abuse allegations deploy sweeping discovery against survivors, advocates, and former classmates, it sends a signal about how power still operates inside systems that claim to have learned from the past.

For journalists, legislators, and anyone who has followed the abuse crisis in the Catholic Church, the pattern is familiar.

Transparency often comes slowly. And it almost always comes because survivors insist on telling the truth.

A Final Word

If the Roman Catholic Diocese of Orange believed that combing through thousands of my emails, discussing subpoenas for my phone records and bank statements, and hauling my classmates into depositions would somehow make me regret speaking about abuse at Mater Dei, they profoundly misunderstood who they were dealing with. Survivors are not intimidated by legal theatrics. We have already endured the far worse experience of being abused and then blamed for it. You can subpoena documents, dissect private messages, and drag witnesses into conference rooms with lawyers—but none of that rewrites history.

The abuse happened. Mater Dei knew.

P.S. For those of you thinking about donating to Mater Dei in honor of its 75th anniversary, maybe ask how much of that money goes to pay their $900/hour lawyers. There are a lot of them. Take my word for it.

Read original blog post

Church choir director accused of sexually abusing teen girl in East Meadow

Selvin Bonilla Navarrete. Photo courtesy of Nassau County Police Department

EAST MEADOW, NY — A 43-year-old man accused of inappropriately touching a teen girl in East Meadow was arrested on Friday.

Selvin Bonilla Navarrete, of Westbury, was a church choir director at Iglesia Pentecostal Jesus Es at the time of the incident on Jan. 4.

Police say he drove the 14-year-old victim to parking lot at 1847 Front St. that afternoon and proceeded to touch her.

Navarrete has since been charged with sexual abuse and endangering the welfare of a child.

He is set to be arraigned Saturday at First District Court in Hempstead.

Read original article

Mexican Pastor Wanted for Child Sex Abuse Captured by Border Agents in California

photo courtesy of Department of Homeland Security

SAN DIEGO, CA — Authorities tracked down the fugitive after he fled to the U.S. from Mexico

A former pastor from Mexico accused of sex crimes against a minor was among two fugitives captured by U.S. Border Patrol agents after fleeing to Southern California. Salvador Suazo-Garcia, who was wanted in Mexico for lewd and lascivious acts involving a child, was arrested in Lemon Grove on March 6. In a separate case, agents in Anaheim nabbed Silvia Del Rosario Torres-Castro, a Mexican national wanted for homicide.

Why It matters

The arrests highlight how some migrants labeled ‘non-criminal’ in the U.S. can still be wanted for serious crimes abroad. The cases also raise questions about border security and the vetting process for migrants entering the country.

The details

Suazo-Garcia originally entered the U.S. legally in May 2021, but his visa was later revoked over the child sex abuse allegations. Authorities tracked him down through cross-border intelligence sharing and arrested him while he was driving a truck. Torres-Castro entered the U.S. illegally in 2023 through the Imperial Beach area. Both fugitives were taken into custody without incident and later turned over to Mexican officials.

  • Suazo-Garcia entered the U.S. legally in May 2021.
  • Suazo-Garcia was arrested on March 6, 2026.
  • Torres-Castro entered the U.S. illegally in 2023.

What they’re saying

“Now, thanks to our law enforcement, these two criminal illegals are back in Mexico to face justice for their crimes.”

— Lauren Bis, DHS Acting Assistant Secretary

“These dangerous criminal illegal aliens were allowed to roam American streets and make our communities less safe.”

— Lauren Bis, DHS Acting Assistant Secretary

What’s next

The details surrounding the alleged sex crimes and homicide in Mexico were not provided, so it is unclear what the next steps will be in those cases.

Read original article

Prosecutors Say Oakland Woman Cashed in Church Parking Lot for $480K

Seventh Avenue Baptist Church in Oakland, whose parking lot was sold out from under its notice

OAKLAND, CA — Oakland, Alameda County prosecutors say a local woman secretly sold a church parking lot and funneled roughly $480,000 from the deal to herself, announcing criminal charges today. The case is raising fresh questions about how churches and other nonprofits keep track of the real estate they rely on for programs and revenue.

Prosecutors: Lot Sold Without Congregation’s OK

According to prosecutors, the property at the center of the case is the parking lot serving Seventh Avenue Baptist Church, and the disputed sale generated about $480,000 that the district attorney alleges was misappropriated from the congregation. Details in the charging documents, including the timeline of the alleged transfers, were reported by The Mercury News. The church’s address is listed as 1740 7th Avenue in Oakland, according to MapQuest.

Charges and Potential Legal Exposure

The allegations center on embezzlement and related theft counts. In California, embezzlement of property or funds over the statutory threshold is typically treated as grand theft and can be charged as either a misdemeanor or a felony. Potential penalties for grand-theft-level embezzlement can include jail or prison time, substantial fines and restitution, and prosecutors often ask courts to order repayment to victims. California law and legal analyses, including those from Shouse Law, outline how theft-by-embezzlement is charged and the range of punishments available.

How Deed and Title Scams Fit This Pattern

While the facts in this specific case remain allegations that must be proved in court, industry data show that schemes involving the sale or encumbrance of property without an owner’s knowledge are a growing risk for parcels that are not closely monitored. A 2025 Deed & Title Fraud Survey from the National Association of REALTORS® found many real estate professionals have encountered deed or title fraud in their markets, particularly involving vacant or lightly supervised parcels, a trend legal observers say leaves noncommercial property vulnerable.

Case Status and What Comes Next

The Alameda County District Attorney’s Office has filed charges, and the matter remains in the early stages of prosecution. Court dates and additional filings were not yet public at the time of reporting. Local prosecutors are pursuing criminal charges and may also seek restitution on behalf of the congregation, according to The Mercury News. For general information about the office handling the case, the Alameda County District Attorney’s contact page lists office locations and public-facing resources.

How Churches and Nonprofits Can Guard Property

Experts recommend that congregations and small nonprofits periodically audit property records, sign up for county recorder fraud-alert services they available, and consult an attorney or title company before signing or accepting any paperwork that affects ownership. Title insurance, routine checks of recorded documents, and clear internal bookkeeping controls can all reduce the odds that a theft or forged transfer goes unnoticed. For legal help or to report suspected fraud, victims are advised to contact local law enforcement or the Alameda County District Attorney’s Office. Consumer resources from the National Association of REALTORS® and county recorder offices outline additional steps owners can take to monitor title activity.

Read original article

Catholic priest sexually assaulted man at his church home after night out

PAISLEY, SCOTLAND — A Roman Catholic priest has been warned he faces jail after being convicted of sexually assaulting a man in the house at his church.

Father Stephen Baillie, who was the parish priest at St Joseph’s Church in Clarkston, East Renfrewshire, abused his victim after they had been on a night out together.

Baillie, who has been a priest for 36 years, denied the single charge against him.

But he was convicted by a jury at Paisley Sheriff Court and warned he faces jail when sentenced next month. The Diocese of Paisley said Baillie has now been removed as a parish priest.

Baillie was released on bail until sentencing.

The sheriff said he was “duty bound” to obtain background reports because Baillie was a first offender and warned that the normal term for such an offence was a “pretty lengthy” term of imprisonment.

Sheriff McGinty said he would allow Baillie to put his affairs “in order” before passing sentence.

Baillie was also placed on the sex offenders’ register, with the exact period he spends on it to be decided when he is sentenced.

The priest has served at churches in Eaglesham, Clarkston, Paisley and Greenock.

The trial heard his victim was physically sick after Baillie attempted to perform a sex act on him after a night out in June 2024.

Baillie assaulted the man while he was “heavily intoxicated and unable to consent”.

The attack happened after they shared a bottle of wine over dinner at a restaurant in Clarkston and drank at a bar before going to Baillie’s home on Eaglesham Road.

The man told the jury that he had agreed to go to the house to call a taxi and Baillie had offered him more alcohol.

He said Baillie performed a number of sex acts on him while at the house – including when he said he needed to leave to get some air.

At one point the victim vomited and was attacked while trying to clean himself up.

A statement on behalf of the Diocese of Paisley described Baillie as “a former priest of the diocese”.

It said the offence was reported directly to Police Scotland by the complainer, and the diocese was not approached prior to the police investigation.

“As the complainer was not identified as a child or vulnerable adult, the case does not fall within the church’s safeguarding procedures as defined under national safeguarding policy,” it said.

“The diocese nevertheless recognises that the conduct established in court represents behaviour incompatible with the standards expected of ordained ministry and commends the courage of those who came forward to report the matter and participate in what has been a long and painful process.”

It said a “canonical process” was underway to decide what action to take next and Baillie had been removed from his role as a parish priest after his conviction.

“The diocese continues to work to foster a culture of care, through a shared commitment to creating and sustaining safe church environments,” the statement said.

Read original article

SNAP Lauds the Ending of Silence Over Cesar Chavez Sexual Abuse of Women and Girls

NEW YORK, NY, March 19, 2026 – SNAP is outraged to learn of the violent abuse perpetrated by Cesar Chavez against women and girls for years, as reported in investigative coverage by the New York Times and other media outlets. And it strengthens our resolve to support all those victimized, no matter how long ago the crimes occurred.

Decades of silence to protect men in power is a toxin that is simultaneously destructive and common. We stand with all survivors against this pernicious history of secret-keeping.

In addition, the fact that Chavez was receiving posthumous medals of freedom and memorials  named after him has made it even harder for victims to come forward. Every time a park, street or school bore his name, the victims felt revictimized and unable to name him as their abuser. SNAP believes that no pedophile deserves to be honored, whether priest or politician.

“The power of one man–even a so-called hero–is no match to the wall of survivors standing tall against him,” said Angela Walker, SNAP Executive Director. “Every voice must be heard so we can dismantle the structures in place to protect the guilty.”

SNAP believes that when the silence is broken, true healing can begin.

You can read the full New York Times investigation here. 

Indian pastor arrested for sexual assault during counselling session

Church of South India (CSI) pastors attending a meeting in the southern Indian city of Madurai. (Photo: csi1947.com)

SOUTH INDIA — Protestant bishop orders CCTV monitoring of all pastoral counselling in a Church of South India diocese

A Protestant bishop in the southern Indian Kerala state has directed all his priests to conduct their pastoral counseling sessions under camera surveillance following the arrest of a pastor accused of assaulting a 19-year-old girl who had approached him for counseling.

Bishop Malayil Sabu Koshy Cherian of the Church of South India’s Madhya (Central) Kerala diocese issued the direction after police arrested Father Santosh Mathew, vicar of the Church in Idukki district, on March 15.

The 53-year-old pastor had been absconding ever since the victim’s family complained to police of sexual assault against him last month.

A police team tracked Mathew to the Catholic Marian pilgrimage center in Velankanni in neighboring Tamil Nadu. A court in Kerala remanded him to 14-day judicial custody.

According to the police complaint, the crime took place on Feb. 7 when the victim, along with her mother, approached Mathew for counselling. He asked her mother to pray inside the Church and took her to the presbytery where he sexually assaulted her, it said.

“Our bishop has instructed that all counselling sessions should be held under the watchful eyes of CCTV cameras,” Father Jiji John Jacob, the diocesan treasurer, told UCA News on March 18.

Jacob clarified that the CCTV recording will be strictly for safety and evidential purposes, and no conversion will be recorded. “The privacy of those seeking counseling will also be protected,” he added.

Meanwhile, the accused pastor has been suspended following his arrest. “We are also holding an internal probe against him to know the truth about the charges against him,” Jacob said.

Father Aniyan K. Paul, the diocesan clergy secretary, said the CSI has a zero-tolerance policy for the sexual abuse of women.

“The diocese will not protect the pastor if he is found guilty,” he noted.

A Church official who did not want to be named told UCA News that the priest had a clean record.

“We will wait for the police to complete the probe, which should reveal the truth behind the serious allegations,” he added.

He said several people within the diocese and in the parish believe the priest has been deliberately trapped in the case to settle personal enmity and family feuds.

The CSI was formed in 1947 after India’s independence from Britain as a union of Protestant denominations. Its counterpart in north India is known as the Church of North India (CNI).

With about 4 million members, CSI is the second-largest Christian denomination in India. It has 24 dioceses, including one in neighboring Sri Lanka.

Read original article

‘The Ramp’ Church Leaders Say Staffer Admitted to Sexual Misconduct Involving Minors

‘The Ramp’ Church logo

BIRMINGHAM, AL — Leaders of The Ramp, a church based in Hamilton, issued a public statement addressing allegations of past misconduct involving a former staff member, saying the matter has been reported to authorities and is under investigation.

The Ramp describes itself on its website as, “The Ramp is a global ministry with a passion and mission to awaken a generation, equip them for their purpose, and send them out to change their world.”

According to the statement, an individual recently came forward alleging they experienced inappropriate sexual contact by a staff member approximately four years ago, when they were a minor. The church identified the staff member as Samuel Bentley.

Church leadership said the allegation was discussed with Bentley, who admitted to the claim. He was subsequently terminated from his position, and the organization’s board of directors was notified. The matter was also reported to appropriate authorities.

A few days later, Bentley disclosed a second incident involving another minor, which was also reported, according to the statement. Leaders said they are cooperating with law enforcement.

The statement noted that, based on current information, the reported incidents did not occur on church property or in connection with Ramp University.

In response, The Ramp announced it has canceled upcoming events, including College Days and Spring Ramp, and is instead holding gatherings focused on prayer and reflection.

Leaders said their priority is supporting those affected and reaffirmed a commitment to safety, accountability, and transparency. The statement also noted that the individuals involved have requested to remain anonymous and asked the community to respect their privacy.

The Hamilton Police Department released a statement addressing the matter Wednesday, March 18. The police department said it is currently not involved in the investigation.

The Hamilton Police Department is aware of the statement released by The Ramp regarding allegations of inappropriate conduct involving a former staff member. This investigation is being handled by the Alabama Law Enforcement Agency (ALEA SBI). At this time, the Hamilton Police Department is not involved in this matter. Any reports or concerns related to this matter should be directed to ALEA SBI, which is the lead investigating agency.

Read original article